FirePro M5950 vs FirePro V5800
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and FirePro V5800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others FirePro V5800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FirePro V5800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 74 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 111% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro V5800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and FirePro V5800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro V5800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and FirePro V5800 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 35 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro M5950 and FirePro V5800 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 3100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 8% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FirePro V5800 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Juniper |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 26 April 2010 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,104.0 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |