FirePro V5800 vs GeForce 825M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce 825M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce 825M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 825M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 124% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 825M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 825M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 825M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 825M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 160 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 825M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 750% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 29% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 140% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 825M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | GK208 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 27 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 30.11 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |