FirePro V5800 vs GeForce 845M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce 845M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce 845M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce 845M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 845M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 845M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 845M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 64% more power consumption, than GeForce 845M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 845M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce 845M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 845M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 845M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 845M is 381 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 845M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce 845M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 7% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce 845M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1071 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 37.63 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 883.7 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |