FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GT 445M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 445M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 445M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GT 445M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 111% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 445M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 445M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GT 445M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 490 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 445M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2750 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GT 445M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | N11E-GE |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 144 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 10.6 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |