FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 102% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 114 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Dota 2 is 56% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Fortnite is 73% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 71% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285M SLI in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
| Code name | Juniper | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |