FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 675M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 675M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GeForce GTX 675M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 675M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 675M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 675M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 675M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 70 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 675M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 675M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 675M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | N13E-GS1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 39.7 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |