FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 675M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 2x 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 3600% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675M SLI - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 70 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
- FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 187% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 192% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Dota 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Fortnite is 126% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 192% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M SLI in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 675M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Juniper | N12E-GTX2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 620 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |