FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 680M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 680M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 680M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680M is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 680M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 680M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 103% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | N13E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 80.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R7 M370
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro K2100M
- FirePro V5800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M