FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 760M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 760M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 760M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 760M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 760M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 34% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 760M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 33 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 760M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Fortnite is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 760M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | N14E-GL |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 657 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 54 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |