FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 850M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 850M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GeForce GTX 850M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 64% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 850M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Fortnite is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Minecraft is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Juniper | N15P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 36.08 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
Check Price |