FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 860M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 860M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 860M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 107 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 860M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 860M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 103% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Juniper | N15P-GX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 797 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |