FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 870M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 870M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 870M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 870M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 870M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 870M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 870M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 251 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 870M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 162% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | N15P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 941 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 108.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 120.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |