FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 950M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 950M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GeForce GTX 950M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 950M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 950M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 950M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 224 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 950M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 950M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Fortnite is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Minecraft is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 77% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | N16P-GT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 44.96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |