FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 960M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 960M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GeForce GTX 960M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 960M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 960M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 960M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 960M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 960M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 406 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 960M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 960M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Juniper | N16P-GX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 47.04 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,505 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |