FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 965M
When comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 965M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 965M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 254 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Juniper | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |