FirePro V5800 vs GeForce MX450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce MX450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce MX450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GeForce MX450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce MX450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5,GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 48% more power consumption, than GeForce MX450.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX450 uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX450 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX450 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX450 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 705 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX450 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 6002 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 162% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce MX450 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
| Code name | Juniper | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 100.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 10002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.03 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |