FirePro V5800 vs GRID K220Q
When comparing FirePro V5800 and GRID K220Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and GRID K220Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GRID K220Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- GRID K220Q has 204% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 511 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 55 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GRID K220Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 2 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |