FirePro V5800 vs GRID K260Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GRID K260Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GRID K260Q, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V5800

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs

GRID K260Q has 204% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 55 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	16−18	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 137% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−12	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5800 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	180−190
ultra / 1080p	50−55	95−100
QHD / 1440p	27−30	50−55
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	90−95
ultra / 1080p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	95−100
medium / 1080p	21−24	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 84% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
QHD / 1440p	1−2	9−10
low / 720p	24−27	50−55
medium / 1080p	12−14	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	75−80
high / 1080p	10−12	30−33
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 85% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	9−10
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	27−30
medium / 1080p	6−7	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	30−35	55−60
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−11	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	55−60
medium / 768p	16−18	30−35
high / 1080p	9−10	18−20
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID K260Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Juniper	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	28 June 2013
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	690 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FirePro V5800 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares