FirePro V5800 vs GRID K520

In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5800

GRID K520

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID K520
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs

GRID K520 has 204% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 55 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K520 - by 28 nm process technology.
GRID K520 is 38 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−12	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5800 and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	180−190
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
QHD / 1440p	27−30	55−60
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	75−80	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	95−100
ultra / 1080p	30−35	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 103% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	80−85
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	10−11
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	6−7	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 19% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−11	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	60−65
medium / 768p	16−18	35−40
high / 1080p	9−10	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID K520
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Juniper	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	23 July 2013
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	690 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	2x 2,448 gflops
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		76 Mh/s

FirePro V5800 vs GRID K520

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares