FirePro V5800 vs GRID M60 8Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and GRID M60 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against GRID M60 8Q, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V5800

GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID M60 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs

GRID M60 8Q has 204% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M60 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 133 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
GRID M60 8Q is 38 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	85−90
4K / 2160p	27−30	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	90−95
high / 1080p	10−12	40−45
ultra / 1080p	6−7	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	6−7	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	70−75
medium / 768p	16−18	45−50
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID M60 8Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Juniper	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	30 August 2015
Pipelines	800	2048
Core clock speed	690 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	150.8
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FirePro V5800 vs GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares