FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
FirePro V5800
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 64% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 490 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Juniper | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K2100M
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FirePro V5800 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book