FirePro V5800 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics P580, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 393% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 340 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro V5800 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Juniper | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2100M
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2