FirePro V5800 vs Quadro 4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Quadro 4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro 4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 4000M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 4000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 215 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- FirePro V5800 and Quadro 4000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 13% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Juniper | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |