FirePro V5800 vs Quadro CX
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Quadro CX
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro CX has 102% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro CX has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 88 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro CX is 38 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 50% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Juniper | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |