FirePro V5800 vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Quadro FX 4800.
FirePro V5800
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 102% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 88 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro FX 4800 is 38 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 36% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Juniper | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |