FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2200M

When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Quadro K2200M.

FirePro V5800

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro V5800 has 13% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2200M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 23 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	85−90
4K / 2160p	27−30	45−50
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	90−95
high / 1080p	10−12	40−45
ultra / 1080p	6−7	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	6−7	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	70−75
medium / 768p	16−18	45−50
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Code name	Juniper	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	19 July 2014
Pipelines	800	640
Core clock speed	690 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	26.68
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	853.8 gflops
Length	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares