FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3000M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 36 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |