FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K3100M
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Quadro K3100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro K3100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K3100M has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K3100M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 16 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 43% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 53% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro K3100M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | N15E-Q1-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 45.18 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |