FirePro V5800 vs Quadro M2200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro M2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Quadro M2200, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 34% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 4 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1508 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 237% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 261% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 43% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 169% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 241% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 153% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 253% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Juniper | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |