FirePro V5800 vs Quadro P3200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro P3200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Quadro P3200, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 18 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 3008 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 462% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 484% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 323% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 475% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 583% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 411% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 523% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Code name | Juniper | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |