FirePro V5800 vs Quadro P500
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Quadro P500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 146% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro P500 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 765 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Quadro P500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Code name | Juniper | GP108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |