FirePro V5800 vs Quadro T1000

When comparing FirePro V5800 and Quadro T1000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Quadro T1000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro V5800

Quadro T1000

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	Quadro T1000
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro V5800 has 48% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 705 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	7−8	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	55−60
ultra / 1080p	9−10	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	130−140	250−260
medium / 768p	100−110	220−230
ultra / 1080p	50−55	180−190
QHD / 1440p	27−30	110−120
4K / 2160p	27−30	70−75
high / 768p	75−80	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	45−50
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	18−20	80−85
medium / 1080p	8−9	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	55−60	180−190
medium / 1080p	21−24	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 292% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	45−50
QHD / 1440p	1−2	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	24−27	100−110
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	140−150
medium / 768p	40−45	120−130
high / 1080p	10−12	70−75
ultra / 1080p	6−7	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	3−4	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	10−12	65−70
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	100−110
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	130−140
medium / 768p	16−18	85−90
high / 1080p	9−10	45−50
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
high / 768p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	Quadro T1000
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Turing
Code name	Juniper	TU117
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	27 May 2019
Pipelines	800
Core clock speed	690 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost Clock		1455 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops
Length	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	N/A

FirePro V5800 vs Quadro T1000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares