FirePro V5800 vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560X has 1% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 217 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 1080 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 192% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 177% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 126% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 114% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Polaris |
Code name | Juniper | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |