FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M270
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon R7 M270. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R7 M270. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 135 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |