FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M275
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M275, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M275.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 235 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |