FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M385
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M385, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M385 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 50% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | Strato |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 56.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |