FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M390X
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M390X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M390X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390X has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M390X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 33 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 253% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 43% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 165% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 246% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Juniper | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |