FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M395
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M395, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Radeon R9 M395, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 144 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 292% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |