FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M470
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M470. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M470. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M470 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M470 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M470 - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 310 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M470 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 87% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M470 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 2 |
| Code name | Juniper | Saturn |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |