FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M485X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M485X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Radeon R9 M485X, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 237% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 33 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M485X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 284% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 126% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 192% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 160% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 316% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 211% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 284% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Juniper | Amethyst |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |