FirePro V5800 vs Tesla C2050

When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Tesla C2050.

FirePro V5800

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 221% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 116 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro V5800 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 19 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	130−140	220−230
medium / 768p	100−110	190−200
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	27−30	70−75
4K / 2160p	27−30	35−40
high / 768p	75−80	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
low / 720p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	21−24	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 119% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−12
low / 720p	24−27	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	85−90
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	10−12
ultra / 1080p	3−4	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	6−7	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	65−70
medium / 768p	16−18	40−45
high / 1080p	9−10	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	Tesla C2050
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	Juniper	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	25 July 2011
Pipelines	800	448
Core clock speed	690 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	229 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

FirePro V5800 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares