FirePro V5800 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Main Specs
FirePro V5800
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
74 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 233% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 116 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro V5800 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 19 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 162% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 119% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
80−85
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 96% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
10−12
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
21−24
60−65
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro V5800.
Full Specs
FirePro V5800
Tesla C2075
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Juniper
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
26 April 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
800
448
Core clock speed
690 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,040 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
27.60
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,104.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
229 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
