FirePro V5800 vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 204% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 116 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro V5800 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Tesla M2070 Q is 19 mm longer, than FirePro V5800.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
FirePro V5800 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Juniper | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |