FirePro V5900 vs GeForce MX110

When choosing between FirePro V5900 and GeForce MX110, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5900 and GeForce MX110.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

GeForce MX110 Check Price

GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:

GeForce MX110 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	GeForce MX110
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5/DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX110 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V5900 and GeForce MX110 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX110 - in Laptops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GeForce MX110 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 365 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX110 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	6−7
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	16−18
medium / 1080p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−12	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	130−140
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	24−27	27−30
4K / 2160p	12−14	27−30
high / 768p	75−80	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	80−85
medium / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
FirePro V5900 and GeForce MX110 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	6−7	8−9
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	3−4
low / 720p	16−18	18−20
medium / 1080p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Fortnite is 17% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	4−5
ultra / 1080p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	12−14
medium / 1080p	4−5	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	12−14
medium / 1080p	9−10	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	24−27
medium / 768p	12−14	16−18
high / 1080p	6−7	9−10
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	GeForce MX110
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman	N16V-GMR1
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2011	1 January 2018
Pipelines	512	256
Core clock speed	600 MHz	965 MHz
Boost Clock		993 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	23.83
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	762.6 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s
Optimus		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs GeForce MX110

GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares