FirePro V5900 vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between FirePro V5900 and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5900 and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V5900 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 145 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
6−7
QHD / 1440p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V5900 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
170−180
medium / 768p
100−110
140−150
ultra / 1080p
50−55
75−80
QHD / 1440p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
12−14
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 57% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
65−70
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
10−11
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
7−8
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
20−22
medium / 1080p
4−5
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
100−105
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
20−22
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
35−40
medium / 768p
12−14
24−27
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
GRID K240Q
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
28 June 2013
Pipelines
512
1536
Core clock speed
600 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
95.36
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Check Price
