FirePro V5900 vs GRID K280Q
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and GRID K280Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others GRID K280Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
GRID K280Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 145 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V5900 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
180−190
medium / 768p
100−110
150−160
ultra / 1080p
50−55
80−85
QHD / 1440p
24−27
45−50
4K / 2160p
12−14
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
85−90
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 78% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
70−75
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
7−8
ultra / 1080p
1−2
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 145% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
40−45
medium / 768p
12−14
27−30
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
medium / 768p
40−45
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
GRID K280Q
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
28 June 2013
Pipelines
512
1536
Core clock speed
600 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
95.36
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Check Price
