FirePro V5900 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V5900 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 300 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−33
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
150−160
medium / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
50−55
60−65
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
12−14
27−30
high / 768p
75−80
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 32% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
30−35
medium / 768p
12−14
20−22
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Cayman
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
3 January 2017
Pipelines
512
48
Core clock speed
600 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
55.20
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
883 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
