FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 4000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro 4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro 4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro 4000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro 4000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
3−4
ultra / 1080p
2−3
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V5900 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
high / 768p
75−80
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
50−55
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
14−16
medium / 1080p
7−8
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
FirePro V5900 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
10−11
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
10−11
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
7−8
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
7−8
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
20−22
16−18
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Quadro 4000M.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro 4000M.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro 4000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Code name
Cayman
Fermi
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
22 February 2011
Pipelines
512
336
Core clock speed
600 MHz
475 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
26.60
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
638.4 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
