FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2100M

When choosing between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro K2100M Check Price

Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:

Quadro K2100M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K2100M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K2100M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 67 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2100M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2100M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	6−7
ultra / 1080p	2−3	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	16−18
medium / 1080p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	21−24
medium / 1080p	10−12	10−12
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	130−140
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	24−27	27−30
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
high / 768p	75−80	75−80
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	75−80
medium / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Quadro K2100M.
high / 1080p	6−7	7−8
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	3−4
low / 720p	16−18	16−18
medium / 1080p	7−8	8−9
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	10−11	10−12
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	4−5
ultra / 1080p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	10−12
medium / 1080p	4−5	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	80−85	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro K2100M.
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 81% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	10−12
medium / 1080p	9−10	10−11
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	20−22	21−24
medium / 768p	12−14	16−18
high / 1080p	6−7	8−9
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	3−4	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 18% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	40−45
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2100M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K2100M
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	GK106
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	23 July 2013
Pipelines	512	576
Core clock speed	600 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	32.02
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	768.4 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	48.0 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	38 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K2100M

Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares