FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 54 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
140−150
medium / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
50−55
55−60
QHD / 1440p
24−27
30−35
4K / 2160p
12−14
27−30
high / 768p
75−80
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
85−90
medium / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 32% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
27−30
medium / 768p
12−14
18−20
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro K3000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
N14E-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
512
576
Core clock speed
600 MHz
654 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
31.39
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
753.4 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
24 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
